Skip to main content

Leading change at your firm when launching Legl

How to lead change when launching Legl: identifying champions, finding power users, and building firm-wide buy-in.

Written by Ula Moyse-White

Overview

Launching Legl is as much about people as it is about technology. The firms that see the fastest adoption, strongest engagement, and best return on investment are the ones that treat the rollout as a change management programme, not a software install.

This guide covers the practical steps to lead that change at your firm. It is written for the Success Owner and Executive Sponsor leading the launch, and it complements the admin launch guide.


What this covers

  • Why change management is critical to a successful Legl launch

  • What to expect: the change curve at your firm

  • How to articulate the impact of Legl to different audiences at your firm

  • How to tailor your approach for centralised and decentralised compliance teams

  • How to identify and equip a change management champion

  • How to identify power users in each department

  • The learning dip: why adoption gets harder before it gets easier

  • Common pitfalls to avoid during firm-wide rollout


Why change management matters when launching Legl

Legl changes how your firm onboards clients, manages compliance, and takes payments. Even when the new process is faster and easier, fee earners and support staff are being asked to step away from a long-established way of working. Without active change management, even well-configured platforms see slow adoption, inconsistent use across teams, and a lower return on investment.

The firms that adopt Legl quickly and consistently share four things in common:

  • Leadership clearly explains why the firm is making the change

  • The launch is led internally by a named champion, not just the Legl team

  • Each department has at least one power user who can support their colleagues

  • The rollout approach matches how the firm is structured

ℹ️ Important

Treating Legl as an IT project rather than a change project is the most common reason firms see slow adoption in the first 90 days. Build the change plan alongside the configuration plan, not after.


What to expect: the change curve at your firm

Even when people support a change in principle, the way they respond emotionally to a new system follows a predictable pattern. Recognising the stage your firm is in helps you respond appropriately rather than mistaking it for a problem with the platform.

Stage

What it sounds like at your firm

What helps

Awareness

"I've heard we're getting a new system"

Clear, early communication of the why

Resistance

"We've always done it this way", "this won't work for our matter type"

Listen genuinely; address specific objections; show peer-firm examples

Exploration

"How do I…?", "Where does this go?"

Hands-on training, accessible support, power users on hand

Acceptance

"OK, this is actually quicker"

Recognise early wins publicly

Adoption

"I wouldn't go back"

Use these advocates to help the next department or office

Resistance is not a sign that the launch is failing. It is a sign that people are taking the change seriously. Plan for it, listen to what is being raised, and address it specifically — generic reassurance does not work.


How to articulate the impact of Legl to your firm

Different audiences at your firm care about different outcomes. The same launch message will not land equally with a managing partner, a fee earner, and an accounts assistant. Tailor what you say to the audience, but keep the core narrative consistent.

For partners and the leadership team

  • Faster file opening and a quicker route to revenue from new matters

  • Stronger compliance posture and a clear audit trail across the firm

  • Reduced operational cost from automating manual onboarding and chasing

  • A more professional, modern client experience that supports retention and referrals

For compliance, risk, and the MLRO function

  • Standardised, repeatable client due diligence across every matter

  • Centralised reporting and oversight without chasing individual fee earners

  • Easier evidence gathering for audits and regulatory reviews

  • Confidence that ongoing monitoring is happening consistently, not by exception

For fee earners and matter handlers

  • Less time spent collecting ID and chasing documents

  • Faster client onboarding so matters can be opened sooner

  • A better experience for clients, who can complete checks on their phone

  • Clear visibility of what is outstanding for each client

For finance and accounts

  • Faster payment turnaround and improved cash flow

  • Fewer manual reconciliations and clearer matter-level reporting

  • Reduction in chasing clients for outstanding invoices

ℹ️ Tip

Ask your Launch Manager for case studies and benchmarks from firms similar in size and practice area to yours. Concrete numbers from peer firms are more persuasive than generic platform benefits.


Tailoring your approach to your compliance model

How your firm manages compliance shapes how Legl should be rolled out. The two most common models are centralised and decentralised, and a number of firms operate a hybrid of the two. The right approach depends on where decisions and reviews happen at your firm.

Centralised compliance teams

In a centralised model, a dedicated team owns onboarding, risk assessments, and ongoing monitoring on behalf of the whole firm. Fee earners hand off the client and the central team takes over.

What this means for your launch:

  • Train the central team in depth first, including all admin functionality, the Compliance Dashboard, and reviewer workflows

  • Give fee earners a lighter-touch session focused on launching workflows and reading client status

  • Set clear handover points: when a fee earner sends an Engage request, who reviews it, and how the result gets back to the matter

  • Configure permissions so the compliance team has reviewer access and fee earners do not unintentionally bypass review

Decentralised compliance teams

In a decentralised model, fee earners or matter handlers are responsible for running their own client due diligence, with oversight from a Head of Compliance or MLRO. This is more common in smaller firms and in firms where individual departments operate semi-independently.

What this means for your launch:

  • Plan for broader, more thorough end-user training because every fee earner is effectively an operator of the platform

  • Invest in clear internal documentation and quick-reference materials so users can self-serve

  • Identify a power user in each department to act as the local expert

  • Use the Compliance Dashboard and reporting to give the MLRO oversight without forcing a manual handover for every matter

Hybrid models

Many firms sit between the two: a central team owns risk and oversight, but fee earners initiate workflows themselves. In this case, take the broader training approach from the decentralised model and combine it with the structured handover and permissions design from the centralised model.

ℹ️ Important

If your firm is mid-restructure, or if compliance ownership is genuinely unclear, agree the operating model before configuring workflows in Legl. Configuring against an unclear process is the most common cause of post-launch rework.


Identifying a change management champion

Your champion is the person at your firm who carries the launch internally, day to day. They are the bridge between the Legl team and your firm, and they hold the rollout to its objectives.

Why a champion is important

  • Adoption stalls without internal advocacy. Your Launch Manager can support, but the message lands harder when it comes from a colleague

  • Champions surface friction and feedback faster than any external team can

  • They keep momentum once the official launch period ends and the Legl team steps back

  • They give partners and fee earners someone they trust to ask questions of

Who makes a good champion

  • Sits close enough to the day-to-day work to understand current pain points

  • Has credibility across the firm, especially with fee earners and partners

  • Is naturally curious about technology and improving how things are done

  • Has the time and the explicit mandate from leadership to lead the change

  • Is not necessarily the most senior person, but is someone people listen to

In many firms the champion is the COO, Head of Operations, Head of Compliance, or a senior Practice Manager. In smaller firms it may be a partner who is leading the change personally.

How to equip your champion

  • Give them protected time. A part-time champion with no capacity will struggle to drive change

  • Make sure they attend admin training and have access to the Compliance Dashboard

  • Give them a direct line to your Legl Launch Manager during launch, and to your Customer Success Manager after go-live

  • Empower them to make small configuration decisions without escalating each one

  • Recognise their work publicly. Champions need visible support from leadership to be effective


Identifying power users in each department

Power users are department-level experts who use Legl regularly and become the first point of contact for their colleagues. While the champion leads the change firm-wide, power users embed it in each team.

Why power users matter

  • Colleagues are more likely to ask the person sitting next to them than to raise a support ticket

  • Power users adapt the firm-wide guidance to their department's specific workflows and matter types

  • They surface department-specific feedback that would otherwise be missed

  • They reduce the support burden on the central champion and on the Legl team

How to identify them

  • Watch for who asks the most questions during training. Curiosity often indicates a future power user

  • Look for people already informally helping colleagues with technology, regardless of seniority

  • Ask department heads to nominate someone, and confirm the nominee has the time and willingness to take it on

  • Aim for at least one power user per department or team. Larger teams benefit from two

How to support them

  • Run a power-user-only training session in addition to standard end-user training

  • Set up a regular forum, such as a monthly call or a dedicated channel, where power users share what they are seeing and learn from each other

  • Acknowledge the role formally so colleagues know who to ask

  • Give them early visibility of new features and changes so they can prepare their team

ℹ️ Tip

Power users are also your strongest source of feature requests and product feedback. Treat them as a focus group, not just a support layer.


The learning dip: why adoption gets harder before it gets easier

When a team learns a new system, performance often gets worse before it gets better. People who were fluent in the old way are now consciously thinking about every step — what to click, where to find things, what comes next. This is normal, predictable, and temporary, but if you do not expect it, it can look like the launch is failing.

The pattern moves through four stages:

  1. Unconscious competence with the old way — the team is fluent in the existing process and barely thinks about it

  2. Conscious incompetence with the new way — the team starts using Legl and is acutely aware of what they don't yet know. This is the dip. Speed drops, frustration rises

  3. Conscious competence with the new way — the team can complete tasks in Legl but still has to think through each step

  4. Unconscious competence with the new way — Legl becomes the default. People work through it without consciously thinking about the system

Most firms see the dip three to six weeks after go-live. Plan for it: a champion check-in, a pulse survey, an additional clinic or drop-in session, and visible reassurance from leadership all help the team move through it rather than retreat to old habits.


When you would use this guide

  • When planning your initial Legl launch

  • When extending Legl to a new department or office after the initial go-live

  • When refreshing engagement after a period of low adoption

  • When onboarding a new champion or new power users

  • After a structural change at the firm, such as a merger, that affects who owns compliance


Key things to be aware of

  • Change management is not a one-off task. Plan for activity before, during, and after go-live, not just at launch

  • The Success Owner, Executive Sponsor, change champion, and power users are distinct roles. One person can hold more than one, but each role needs to be deliberately assigned

  • Adoption tends to dip three to six weeks after go-live, once the initial energy fades. Plan a check-in for that window

  • If your firm is rolling out across multiple departments or offices, sequence rather than parallelise. A successful pilot creates internal advocates for the next wave

  • Resistance is information. Listen to it, address what is valid, and use it to refine your approach

ℹ️ Important

  • Change management activity should start before the kick-off call, not at go-live

  • A named champion with explicit, leadership-backed time is the single biggest predictor of fast adoption

  • Aim for at least one power user per department, identified before training begins

  • Tailor your messaging by audience, but keep the firm's core reason for adopting Legl consistent across every group

  • If your compliance model changes after go-live, revisit your training, permissions, and handover points to keep the platform aligned with how the firm now operates

Did this answer your question?